Also, since we’re playing:
I know, I’m not going to win.
Argh! Leggings aren’t pants! They’re meant to be worn under a skirt or your regular pants! Sorry, this just really pisses me off… doesn’t she have a friend to say “Hey girl, I can see your undies, put some pants on.”?
Those aren’t leggings. They’re hose. I’m pretty sure she’s just confused…or stupid. Probably stupid.
Actually, I see this quite a bit here in the big city (though not usually to this extent…it’s usually that their shirt is just a *little* too short). The only conclusion I’ve been able to draw is that it’s poorer teens trying to be on-trend. A pair of pantyhose can cost as little as a dollar, while real leggings are much, much more expensive. I don’t condone it, but I’ve tried to understand it, as much as I also want to scream “PUT ON SOME DAMN PANTS!” I’ve also dropped some (new) real leggings and longer t-shirts with charities, in the hopes that they’ll make it to the teens who would do this and save me from seeing their crotch.
She appears to be with someone – maybe two someones if the shoes are an indication. You’d think one of them would at least suggest a longer shirt.
She gotta be cold, you think? Don’t you think that’d clue her in?
It looks as if she may have a longer shirt/sweater on, but it has the “ride up with wear” problem. But still, indeed the cold breeze through poor old Kitty’s whiskers should have clued her in.
Exactly what I was thinking. There was a time when people would tell you your fly is open, or your pants are see-through.
“Mommy, why does Hello Kitty keep belching?”
Saddest part is this is done intentionally. This is why some schools have decided to ban leggings; there’s always someone who has to go to far (or in this case, not far enough- into a dark pit, perhaps?).
They really aren’t making those Lululemons like they used to.
Oh Hell-no Kitty!!!
You must be logged in to post a comment.